This post was originally published on this site.
Cotton_Arkansas-Farm-Bureau-Federation
For years, people scratched their heads wondering why Bill Gates was quietly buying up farmland across eighteen states, accumulating 275,000 acres of American agricultural land. Jeff Bezos, Michael Dell, Larry Ellison, and other Silicon Valley billionaires followed suit. At the time it seemed eccentric, but now it makes complete sense. The reason should concern every American who cares about food security, local governance, and the character of rural communities.
The answer is data centers. The massive server farms that power artificial intelligence require enormous parcels of flat land, access to power infrastructure, and large water supplies. Farmland checks every box. Reports indicate roughly two-thirds of new data center construction is happening in rural areas on former agricultural land. In states like Virginia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Kentucky, and Michigan, developers have offered farmers as much as $120,000 per acre —prices that make saying no very difficult.
The consequences are real and, in many cases, irreversible. Once productive farmland is paved over and built upon, it doesn’t come back. Plus, these facilities consume staggering amounts of power and water. Data centers in the United States collectively draw an estimated 449 million gallons per day for cooling, with a single large facility potentially draining as much water as an entire small town.
The good news is communities are pushing back! In Saline Township, Michigan, residents voted against a sixteen-billion-dollar OpenAI-Oracle project, only to face a lawsuit from the developers. Farmers in Kentucky turned down twenty-six million dollars for their land. Similar resistance has appeared in Wisconsin and other states. Citizens in Festus, Missouri, ousted several city council members who approved a massive data center proposal over community objections, and recall petitions have been launched against some others.
But here is where it gets troubling for anyone who believes in local self-governance. Federal and state authorities have increasingly classified data centers as critical national security infrastructure, using that designation to fast-track permitting and override local zoning decisions. Communities that vote no are being told the decision isn’t theirs to make.
That is what happens when the interests of tech giants and the federal government collide with the rights of ordinary Americans to shape their own communities.
Productive farmland feeds this nation. It should not be quietly transferred to the AI industry under the cover of national security.
Stay informed and engaged at PhyllisSchlafly.com, and join us again for the Phyllis Schlafly Report.
